Land Revenue Systems in British India
Log Entry: The Mechanics of Economic Drain
The British Land Revenue systems were the fuel for the industrialization of England and the primary cause of the de-industrialization of India. As I study the "Sunset Clause" and the "Zamindari logic," I am struck by the cold, mathematical precision of colonial extraction. To maintain my own "revenue" of energy while in a calorie deficit, I must be just as precise. Discipline in 1500-word study blocks is my economic policy; consistency is my territory. Understanding these systems is a reminder that whoever controls the surplus controls the future.
I. From Diwani Rights to Permanent Settlement (1793 AD)
The Era of Trial and Error (1765 AD – 1785 AD)After the Battle of Buxar, the British received the Diwani Rights in 1765 AD. Initially, they farmed out revenue collection to the highest bidders (the Izaredari system). This led to extreme exploitation and the Great Bengal Famine of 1770 AD. By the time Lord Cornwallis arrived, the Company realized they needed a stable, long-term class of allies to ensure consistent income.
The Permanent Settlement of Bengal (1793 AD)Introduced by Lord Cornwallis in 1793 AD, this system made the Zamindars the hereditary owners of the land. The revenue was fixed "permanently" at 10/11ths for the Company and 1/11th for the Zamindar. While it created a loyalist class, the "Sunset Clause"—stating that land would be auctioned if revenue wasn't paid by sunset on a specific date—led to the mass displacement of traditional landowners and the absolute misery of the actual tillers of the soil.
II. The Ryotwari System: Direct Extraction (1820 AD)
Sir Thomas Munro and the Madras Experiment (1820 AD)Recognizing the flaws of the middleman-heavy Bengal system, Sir Thomas Munro introduced the Ryotwari system in the Madras and Bombay Presidencies in 1820 AD. The logic was "Direct Dealings": the state dealt directly with the individual peasant (Ryot), who was recognized as the owner of the land as long as he paid the tax.
The Burden of Periodic Revision (1820 AD – 1840 AD)Unlike the Permanent Settlement, the revenue in the Ryotwari system was not fixed; it was revised every 20 or 30 years. Often, the demand was set so high (up to 50-60% of the produce) that the Ryots were forced into the hands of moneylenders. This created a new cycle of rural indebtedness that defined Southern India's economy for decades.
III. The Mahalwari System: The Village Unit (1833 AD)
Holt Mackenzie’s Collective Assessment (1833 AD)In the North-Western Provinces and the Punjab, a different approach was needed due to the communal nature of land ownership. In 1833 AD, under William Bentinck, the Mahalwari System was formalized. The revenue was settled with the "Mahal"—an entire village unit represented by a headman (Lambardar).
Social Impact and the Lambardar (1833 AD – 1857 AD)The collective responsibility meant that if one farmer failed, the whole village suffered. This system preserved some community structures but often turned the village headmen into oppressive agents of the state. By 1850 AD, the high demands in the Mahalwari regions (like Awadh) became a primary driver for the peasant participation in the 1857 Revolt.
IV. Long-term Socio-Economic Consequences
Commercialization of Agriculture (1850 AD – 1900 AD)Because revenue had to be paid in cash, farmers were forced to switch from food crops to cash crops like Indigo, Cotton, and Jute. By 1860 AD, this "Commercialization" had made India vulnerable to recurring famines, as food security was sacrificed for export profits.
The Rise of Absentee Landlordism (c. 1880 AD)The legal framework allowed land to be sold for non-payment of debt. By the late 19th century, land was passing from the hands of cultivators to urban moneylenders who had no interest in agricultural improvement—a phenomenon known as Absentee Landlordism. This structural rot remained until the land reforms of post-independence India.
No comments:
Post a Comment