Moderate vs Extremist Era
Log Entry: The Ideological Pendulum
The struggle between the Moderates and Extremists was essentially a battle between "Patience" and "Action." As I navigate my own discipline—balancing a long-term calorie deficit with the immediate intensity of my study hours—I see the value in both. The Moderates teach us the power of building a foundation, while the Extremists remind us that sometimes, a bold push is necessary to break the status quo. To master this history, I must be as analytical as Naoroji and as passionate as Tilak.
I. The Moderate Era: Constitutionalism (1885 AD – 1905 AD)
The Founding of INC and the 'Three Ps' (1885 AD)Led by figures like Dadabhai Naoroji, Pherozeshah Mehta, and Gopal Krishna Gokhale, the early nationalists believed in British justice. Their method was the 'Three Ps': Petition, Prayer, and Protest. They sought to influence British public opinion and believed that India’s path to self-rule lay within the British legal framework.
The Drain Theory and Economic Critique (1867 AD – 1901 AD)The greatest contribution of the Moderates was the intellectual groundwork. Dadabhai Naoroji’s "Drain of Wealth" theory, finalized in his 1901 AD book Poverty and Un-British Rule in India, exposed how Britain was systematically siphoning India’s capital. This shifted the focus from purely political grievances to the economic roots of Indian poverty.
II. The Rise of Extremism: Militant Nationalism (1905 AD – 1919 AD)
The Partition of Bengal (1905 AD)Lord Curzon’s decision to partition Bengal in 1905 AD was the catalyst for Extremism. It revealed the futility of Moderate petitions. Leaders like Lala Lajpat Rai, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, and Bipin Chandra Pal (Lal-Bal-Pal) argued that 'Swaraj' was a right to be taken, not a favor to be asked. Tilak’s famous slogan—"Swaraj is my birthright and I shall have it"—became the heartbeat of the era.
Methods of Resistance: Boycott and Swadeshi (1906 AD)Unlike the Moderates, Extremists called for Passive Resistance. This included the boycott of foreign goods, the promotion of Swadeshi (indigenous) industries, and national education. They transformed the freedom struggle from an elite debate into a mass movement, involving students, women, and the working class for the first time.
III. The Great Schism: Surat Split and its Aftermath
The Surat Split (1907 AD)The friction reached a breaking point at the 1907 AD Surat Session. The Moderates wanted to confine the Swadeshi movement to Bengal, while the Extremists wanted to take it nationwide. The meeting ended in chaos, and the Congress split. This division was a major setback, as it allowed the British to implement the policy of "Divide and Rule" more effectively.
The Lucknow Pact and Re-unification (1916 AD)The isolation of both groups led to their decline. Recognizing that a divided house could not stand, the two factions reunited at the 1916 AD Lucknow Session, thanks to the efforts of Tilak and Annie Besant. This period also saw the signing of the Lucknow Pact with the Muslim League, briefly creating a united front against British imperialism.
IV. Legacy: Paving the Way for the Gandhian Era
Transition of Leadership (1915 AD – 1919 AD)By 1919 AD, with the passing of Gokhale (1915) and Tilak (1920), the stage was set for Mahatma Gandhi. The Moderates had provided the intellectual framework, and the Extremists had provided the passion and the mass-base. Gandhi synthesized both—combining the moral constitutionalism of Gokhale with the mass agitation of Tilak.
Impact on the Constitution (Post-1919 AD)The focus on civil liberties and constitutional reform advocated by the Moderates eventually found its way into the Government of India Act 1935 AD and later into the Constitution of independent India. Meanwhile, the spirit of self-reliance (Swadeshi) remains a core pillar of Indian economic policy to this day.
No comments:
Post a Comment